Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Case library

US · ongoing · ~6 min read

Nasri v. Mountainside Medical

2026–present · acute surgical services

An independent surgeon sued a New Jersey hospital and two surgical groups on October 2, 2026 over access to emergency call. The case is new.

The story

The market alleged is acute surgery in one county.

The plaintiff says a vote capped who could take call.

No court has tested those facts.

Why it matters

Patients' choice of emergency surgeon is the stake.

What was claimed

Dominant groups excluded an independent surgeon from the hospital.

The other side

Hospitals say credentialing is a quality process. That defense is not yet a ruling.

What it means for you

Hospital call schedules do not change on filing day.

Bottom line

The Mountainside surgery case is live and newly filed.

Timeline

  1. 2 October 2026

    Surgeon sues

    A surgeon sued in New Jersey over on-call and credentialing exclusion.

Key dates

Complaint
2 October 2026

Formal snapshot

Summary: A surgeon sued Mountainside Medical, Hackensack Meridian, and two surgical groups on October 2, 2026, alleging they shut independent surgeons out of emergency call in northern Essex County. No ruling is recorded.

Regulator / plaintiff argument: The complaint says two groups controlled the call schedule and used credentialing to exclude a rival.

Outcome: Newly filed.

Conduct tags

refusal to dealmarket access

Laws referenced

  • Sherman Act §1 — 15 U.S.C. §1
  • Sherman Act §2 — 15 U.S.C. §2

Companies

Sources

Reader signals

0 reads · synced via local demo storage — add NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_* to enable shared likes and comments

Comments

    No comments yet — start the thread.