Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Case library

US · fined · ~8 min read

U.S. v. Asphalt Specialists / Michigan asphalt paving bid-rigging

2013–2025 · asphalt paving, local construction, government contracting, small business cartels

Michigan paving companies—not oil majors—rigged bids so the ‘losing’ contractor submitted a fake high quote. Customers thought they ran a competitive tender. Federal prosecutors treated it as a felony: multi-million-dollar fines and jail for executives.

The story

Asphalt paving for roads, lots, and public sites is often bid locally. When only a few contractors can do the work, collusion is both tempting and devastating for taxpayers.

According to DOJ, ASI and rivals talked through who wanted which job, then had the designated loser submit a deliberately non-competitive price. On paper it looked like rivalry; in reality the winner was pre-selected.

That is textbook bid-rigging under Sherman Act §1—prosecuted criminally. ASI’s $6.5 million fine and executive prison sentences show that ‘we’re just a local paving shop’ does not shrink the statute.

The Procurement Collusion Strike Force has made infrastructure cartels a priority. Small and mid-size contractors on public jobs sit squarely in the crosshairs.

Why it matters

Public contracts inflate when cover bidding replaces real competition.

Owners and estimators can go to prison—not only the company.

Local SMEs are frequent defendants in DOJ cartel dockets.

What was claimed

Conspiracy to rig asphalt paving bids in Michigan.

Submission of intentionally non-competitive complementary bids.

Multi-year coordination among named paving firms.

The other side

Defendants pleaded guilty rather than contest liability at trial.

Sentencing followed U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and cooperation factors.

What it means for you

Never swap intended bid prices with a competitor.

Train estimators that ‘courtesy bids’ for rivals are illegal.

If approached to cover-bid, refuse in writing and consider reporting.

Bottom line

Local asphalt firms learned bid-rigging is a federal crime with prison time—size offers no exemption.

Timeline

  1. 2013–2018

    Cover bidding on paving jobs

    Competitors allegedly decided winners in advance and supplied losing bids priced to lose, creating a false auction.

  2. 2023–2024

    Pleas across companies

    ASI, Al’s Asphalt, F. Allied Construction and multiple individuals pleaded guilty in related Michigan paving probes.

  3. 2024–2025

    Fines and prison

    Corporate fines topped millions; former ASI president received prison time and a large personal fine.

Key dates

Conspiracy period (ASI strand)
2013–2018
ASI plea
January 2024
ASI $6.5M fine
August 2024
Executive prison sentence
May 2025

Formal snapshot

Summary: DOJ prosecuted Michigan asphalt paving firms—including Asphalt Specialists LLC (ASI)—for years of cover bidding that faked competition on paving contracts. ASI was sentenced to a $6.5 million criminal fine; executives faced prison. The case shows local contractors face Sherman Act felonies, not just civil risk.

Regulator / plaintiff argument: Rivals coordinated who would win paving jobs, then submitted intentionally non-competitive ‘cover’ bids so customers thought they saw real competition.

Outcome: Multiple guilty pleas; ASI fined $6.5 million (2024); executives sentenced including prison terms and personal fines; investigation yielded over $8.2 million in corporate criminal fines to date.

Remedies: Criminal fines, restitution exposure, incarceration for individuals, ongoing PCSF scrutiny of public procurement.

Conduct tags

cartel coordinationprice fix

Laws referenced

  • Sherman Act §1 — 15 U.S.C. §1

Companies

Sources

Reader signals

0 reads · synced via local demo storage — add NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_* to enable shared likes and comments

Comments

    No comments yet — start the thread.