Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Case library

US · fined · ~5 min read

U.S. v. Mr. David’s Flooring — commercial flooring bid-rigging

2009–2021 · commercial flooring, local construction, government contracting, small business cartels

A commercial flooring contractor pleaded guilty to years of fake competing bids and faced a recommended fine of $1.2–$1.6 million. Mid-market trades learn the hard way that ‘helping’ a rival with a high quote is bid-rigging.

The story

Office build-outs and institutional facilities need carpet and hard flooring. Bids often look competitive on paper. DOJ’s Chicago flooring probe found contractors taking turns—and covering for each other with intentional losing quotes.

Mr. David’s Flooring admitted participation and agreed to recommend a seven-figure criminal fine. Sister cases charged other installers and even a manufacturer account executive who helped orchestrate rotations.

For small commercial contractors, those dollars are existential. A seven-figure fine plus reputational damage can end a family business even when the underlying jobs seemed routine.

Why it matters

Complementary bidding is a common SME construction offence.

Multi-year schemes accumulate huge guideline fines.

Industry-wide probes mean one confession can cascade.

What was claimed

Bid-rigging and price-fixing on commercial flooring contracts.

Meetings and communications to suppress competition.

The other side

Company pleaded guilty under a negotiated fine recommendation.

What it means for you

Decline any request to ‘put in a number so we look busy.’

Audit historical email for cover-bid language if you inherit an old firm.

Consider leniency counsel immediately if you discover past participation.

Bottom line

Mr. David’s Flooring’s plea shows construction SMEs remain a DOJ cartel staple.

Timeline

  1. 2009–2017

    Industry bid coordination

    DOJ’s flooring investigation alleged contractors exchanged complementary bids and fixed prices on commercial installation jobs.

  2. 2021

    Corporate plea

    Mr. David’s Flooring pleaded guilty; parties jointly recommended a $1.2–$1.6 million fine.

Key dates

Conspiracy period (charged industry probe)
2009–2017
Mr. David’s plea agreement
August 2021

Formal snapshot

Summary: Mr. David’s Flooring International, LLC—a commercial flooring contractor—pleaded guilty to rigging bids and fixing prices with rivals. The plea agreement recommended a criminal fine between $1.2 and $1.6 million, another mid-market construction SME caught in DOJ’s flooring industry probe.

Regulator / plaintiff argument: Flooring contractors met and communicated to suppress competition by rigging bids and fixing prices on commercial flooring jobs across the United States.

Outcome: August 2021 plea agreement recommending a $1.2–$1.6 million criminal fine; part of a broader Chicago flooring investigation with multiple company and individual pleas.

Remedies: Criminal fine within the agreed range; ongoing related prosecutions in the industry.

Conduct tags

cartel coordinationprice fix

Laws referenced

  • Sherman Act §1 — 15 U.S.C. §1

Companies

Sources

Reader signals

0 reads · synced via local demo storage — add NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_* to enable shared likes and comments

Comments

    No comments yet — start the thread.