Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Companies

Competition record

Plasmatica

Deep profile · 1 linked library matter

Plasmatica is the plaintiff in the September 2026 Medtronic case. It sells a laparoscopic anti-fog product and alleges bundle penalties blocked hospital trials.

Overview

Plasmatica is a smaller surgical-device firm. Its product is an anti-fog tool for laparoscopy. It is in this directory because it is the plaintiff against Medtronic, not because it has been accused of a restraint.

The September 18, 2026 complaint says hospital contracts made a trial of its product expensive. Plaintiffs in exclusive-dealing cases have to show the discount functioned as a lock, not merely a lower price.

The matter is at the pleading stage.

Competition footprint

The rival is the party claiming foreclosure. That is a different posture from a dominant-firm defendant.

Hospital value analysis committees are the gate.

No court has credited the complaint.

Consumer & business angle

Surgeons are the users. Supply-chain staff sign the contract.

Patients do not choose the anti-fog brand.

What to watch

  • The pleading stage of its case against Medtronic.
  • Whether other device makers file similar bundle claims.

Markets

surgical devices · laparoscopic anti-fog devices

Also known as: rostam medical

Conduct themes

market accessexclusivitytying