Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Case library

US · ongoing · ~6 min read

Pospisil v. ATP Tour

2026–present · professional tennis

Tennis players' antitrust case survived a motion to dismiss on September 30, 2026. Pay and rival-tournament claims are still in court.

The story

The suit attacks ranking and scheduling rules as compensation restraints.

It names the tours and the Grand Slams.

The judge said that package was enough to proceed.

Why it matters

Player pay is the stake. Fans see it as which tournaments can exist.

What was claimed

The tours and Slams jointly capped pay and shut out rival events.

The other side

Surviving dismissal is not a finding that the rules are illegal.

What it means for you

Tournament calendars do not change because a complaint moved forward.

Bottom line

Pospisil v. ATP is a live case after the September 30, 2026 order.

Timeline

  1. 30 September 2026

    Antitrust claims proceed

    The Southern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss player claims against the tours and Grand Slam organizers.

Key dates

Motion to dismiss denied
30 September 2026

Formal snapshot

Summary: Players allege the ATP, WTA, and Grand Slam events suppressed pay and excluded rival tournaments. On September 30, 2026 the court denied dismissal. There is no trial verdict.

Regulator / plaintiff argument: The court said the complaint plausibly described ranking rules, scheduling, and a ranking-points agreement as one restraint.

Outcome: The antitrust claims remain. Dismissal was denied.

Conduct tags

price fixmarket access

Laws referenced

  • Sherman Act §1 — 15 U.S.C. §1

Companies

Sources

Reader signals

0 reads · synced via local demo storage — add NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_* to enable shared likes and comments

Comments

    No comments yet — start the thread.