Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Companies

Competition record

ATP

Deep profile · 1 linked library matter

The ATP runs the men's professional tennis tour and the rankings that decide who enters tournaments. Player antitrust claims about ranking and scheduling rules survived dismissal on 30 September 2026, in the same order as the WTA, and that is not a finding.

Overview

The ATP publishes the men's ranking and sets the calendar of tournaments players are expected to enter. Points from those events decide entry, seeding, and who is paid at the top of a draw.

Players sued over the ranking and scheduling rules. On 30 September 2026 a court refused to dismiss the antitrust claims.

A claim that survives dismissal is a plausible pleading, not a decision that the rules are unlawful. The same order kept the WTA's claims as well.

Competition footprint

One men's ranking list is what tournaments use to select and seed the field.

Scheduling rules tell a player which weeks count and which events are effectively required.

The WTA traveled in the same 30 September 2026 order, but it is a separate tour.

Consumer & business angle

Players earn or lose the ranking points, while fans buy tickets and broadcasts and do not sit in the rule meetings.

Tournaments that want their results to count for ATP points have to follow the tour's entry rules.

What to watch

  • Whether the ranking and scheduling claims reach summary judgment.
  • How one court treats ATP and WTA rules together.

Markets

men's professional tennis · player rankings · professional tennis

Also known as: atp tour, association of tennis professionals

Conduct themes

cartel coordinationmarket accessprice fix