Scan a website for consumer and competition risks, report a problem, and search live cases. Not a law firm.

CounterLayer
← Case library

US · ongoing · ~6 min read

CRMLS v. Compass

2026–present · residential real estate listings

A California multiple-listing service sued Compass on October 5, 2026 to defend rules that push public listings into the MLS. The case is open.

The story

Compass has challenged traditional listing rules.

CRMLS filed first, seeking a declaration that its one-day filing rule is lawful.

The complaint says sellers can still use non-exclusive arrangements.

Why it matters

Home sellers and buyers see this as whether a listing is public.

What was claimed

CRMLS wants a judgment that the rule is not a group boycott.

The other side

Compass's position, as described by CRMLS, is that the rule is an antitrust problem.

What it means for you

Listing rules stay as they are until a court says otherwise.

Bottom line

CRMLS v. Compass is a live case filed October 5, 2026.

Timeline

  1. 5 October 2026

    MLS sues for a declaration

    California Regional MLS asked a New York court to declare its cooperation rules lawful after Compass threatened an antitrust suit.

Key dates

Declaratory complaint
5 October 2026

Formal snapshot

Summary: On October 5, 2026 a California listing service sued Compass, asking a court to declare that rules requiring publicly marketed listings to be filed with the MLS are not an illegal boycott. The dispute is open.

Regulator / plaintiff argument: CRMLS says the rules stop large brokerages from hiding inventory. Compass's threat is the other side of the same fight.

Outcome: Newly filed. No declaration has been entered in this summary.

Conduct tags

refusal to dealmarket access

Laws referenced

  • Sherman Act §1 — 15 U.S.C. §1

Companies

Sources

Reader signals

0 reads · synced via local demo storage — add NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_* to enable shared likes and comments

Comments

    No comments yet — start the thread.